Fillers: Why 'Um' Isn't Always a Mistake
[Mic Drop]: Most leaders think filler words are verbal bad habits, proof of nerves, or a lack of polish. But neuroscience tells a different story: those tiny “ums” and “uhs” aren't random slips as they reveal what your brain is doing under pressure. Used sparingly, they can even help your listeners process complex ideas. The problem isn't the filler itself but what it signals about your thinking. This piece unpacks the science behind that pause and shows how owning silence, not fluency, is what makes your voice credible.
For decades, filler words and sounds have been dismissed as verbal clutter - the “ums” and “uhs” that blur ideas and betray nerves. Yet neuroscience and behavioral research show the story is more nuanced. How we use fillers, and how often, quietly shapes how others judge confidence, likability, and credibility. Studies show the average speaker uses about five fillers per minute (roughly one every twelve seconds), a pace that feels natural in casual conversation but distracting in professional settings. Performance improves markedly when that drops to around one filler per minute. Another experiment comparing speeches with 0, 2, 5, and 12 fillers per minute found the same pattern: moderation beats elimination. A low, non-zero rate sounds authentic; too many erode clarity and trust. In leadership communication, that small margin between natural and noisy often decides whether you sound thoughtful or unready.
What Neuroscience Says About Fillers
Recent neuroscience has shed surprising insights into how the brain processes disfluencies and why filler words, such as "you know" and "so," affect leadership credibility more than most people realize.
Cognitive Load Theory says that human working memory has limited capacity; when speech is cluttered with non-essential pauses, fillers, or complex jumps, the listener's brain uses extra resources to keep up.
Leadership Insight: Clear, structured signal-delivery is how your audience's brain can process what you're saying. Clean your sentences, pick your moment for a brief pause (or minimal filler), and you'll make your ideas land harder.
Studies show that strategic pausing triggers what scientists call a "processing reset", giving both speaker and listener a micro-moment to recalibrate neural rhythms and restore focus.
Leadership Insight: Replace filler "you know" with a deliberate pause. This signals confidence and matches how the brain absorbs complex information; a quick pause primes listeners for greater impact.
The brain's trust network involves the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala. When a speaker appears inconsistent or disfluent, the amygdala registers a potential threat or uncertainty, and the prefrontal cortex must spend extra effort to assess credibility and context.
Leadership Insight: If your speech includes frequent unexpected fillers or shifts, the audience's brain may be doing extra “risk-checking”. Minimizing those triggers means you reduce unconscious friction and build trust more smoothly.
Social bonding and trust are tied to neuro-chemicals like oxytocin. Leaders who communicate in a way that reduces perceived threat (clear message, calm voice, steady pace) enable higher oxytocin and lower cortisol responses in listeners, which means the audience is more open.
Leadership Insight: When you're about to say something high-stakes (leadership vision, strategy pivot), your tone, pace, and clarity matter as much as the content. You're not only “telling a story”, you're anchoring the neural state of your audience to trust you first.
Used well, fillers like “well” or “so” can be a powerful communication tool. Studies show that fillers placed at clause boundaries, such as just before a new idea, can improve listener memory and comprehension. Think of them as verbal punctuation: they subtly cue the brain to pay attention, especially when complex or unfamiliar information is coming next.
Leadership Insight: Strategic filler use before low-frequency or abstract terms can prime your audience's brain to process the upcoming message more effectively.
Listening brains seek predictability. When speech rhythm, tone, or structure are erratic (e.g., lots of “like” that break the flow), neural signatures of processing fluency drop, which correlates with lower credibility ratings.
Leadership Insight: Consistent phrasing, cadence, and structure support your authority. If the brain is busy untangling your delivery, it won't focus on your message. Make your pattern dependable; then you can break it with purpose.
Beyond the Numbers: What Shapes Filler Use
Neuroscience explains how fillers work. But the why behind their impact is shaped by culture, context, and bias, the subtler layers of leadership communication:
Cultural Context - Pause length signals meaning in every culture. In English, “um” shows hesitation. In German, a crisp pause shows control. In Japanese, long silences show respect. Across cultures, these codes blur. Listeners often forgive pauses from non-native speakers, seeing them as language processing, not doubt. Confidence in one culture may seem uncertain in another. The best communicators read both local rules and the global context.
Gender & Bias - How fillers are heard depends not just on what's said, but who's listening. Research finds that while both men and women rate filler-rich speech as less credible, male listeners tend to react more negatively overall. Beyond gender, accent, and age also shape how confidence is perceived. For leaders, the point is awareness: your words land through someone else's filters.
Virtual vs. In-Person Communication - On-screen, silence stretches differently. Lag, weak audio, and missing body language can make a single filler feel longer or more noticeable. In virtual leadership, verbal precision matters more - but so does warmth. A controlled pause paired with an intentional gesture or steady gaze restores the nuance lost through the screen.
Audience Adaptation - The right level of polish depends on who's listening. A boardroom values precision; an all-hands meeting rewards authenticity. Media interviews sit somewhere between conversational and crisp. Effective leaders shift gears, adjusting fluency without losing voice. The art lies in that calibration: the ability to sound real without sounding raw.
Closing Reflection: The Strategic Takeaway for Leaders
Filler words aren't enemies to be erased; they're signals to be understood. They surface when thought runs faster than speech, and these moments reveal complexity, not incompetence. The work isn't to chase perfect fluency but to build presence. Track your patterns. Notice when and why a filler appears, and decide whether it's buying time or leaking uncertainty.
Now, make it a habit. Choose one meeting this week to consciously practice the pause and monitor your fillers. Take note of the difference in your presence and the response from your audiences. Use this simple exercise to start leading with greater clarity and confidence.
+++
If you want to improve your leadership skills, broaden your impact inside your organization and beyond, or simply require an experienced outside partner, then please book an initial, no-obligation chat here.
